Your entire body would be moving, the OLED display in your visors would bring you closer psychologically, it would be one great leap from today's way of gaming and computer usage toward deeper and greater immersion. You would no longer be sitting at a desk staring into a monitor using a mouse and keyboard moving only your fingers, hands, and minimally your arms. You could learn to do things, have your muscle memory adapt to movements, learn things truly as though they were real, and then go out and apply it! This PNG image was uploaded on December 16, 2016, 11:53 am by user: suhaibquazy171 and is about Battlefield, Battlefield 1, Battlefield 3, Battlefield Bad Company 2, Computer Icons. in the image matrix (the whiter the pixel, the better the correlation score). You would no longer be sitting at a desk staring into a monitor using a mouse and keyboard moving only your fingers, hands, and minimally your arms. Cross-Correlation employed to locate a x logo in Battlefield 3 Figure 2. Imagine a skydiving simulator, sports simulator (compared to today's joystick/controller/keyboard/mouse-based games), wrestling/boxing simulator, swimming simulator, space simulator. In real life it would appear as though you are placing your hands on invisible walls - like a mime! The arms would prevent you from moving your hands "through the wall". Imagine walking up to a wall in-game and placing your hands on the wall. Your physical strength would could too, so as you wrestle whomever on the ground (in-game), you feel their strength against yours. Imagine sneaking up behind someone, placing your weapon down, and tackling a crouching enemy soldier from behind and having a wrestling fist-fight on the ground with your opponent. There are 60 Battlefield 3 wallpapers published on this page. What you do with your body in the real world is what happens in-game with your character. Battlefield 3 Wallpapers Feel free to use these Battlefield 3 images as a background for your PC, laptop, Android phone, iPhone or tablet. Just image playing a game like Counter-Strike or Battlefield 3 where there are no animations in models YOU are the animator, and YOU animate real-time. Of course, there would have to be some safety mechanisms put into place so as not to cause serious injury (such as forcing you to do splits or bend your elbow backwards). The arms would also have mechanics so that they could move and manipulate your body. In addition, there would be 4 Kinect-like devices to capture extremely accurate and precise movements and modeling of your body, and as part of the suit to which arms of the gyroscope attach you would wear a helmet with a built-in OLED in the visor (which is also not see-through - the visor is fully opaque), built-in microphone, and built-in headphones. The foundation of the design would be based around a gyroscope you would be suspended inside this by arms that reach out and attach to parts of your body (joints, ligaments, vertices, etcetera). It's like playing Mario 64 at 1080p.I have an idea that would be revolutionary and doable. at such high screen res, it makes unintended polygonal details all the more apparent. The screen resolution is extremely high, but if you look at the curve of the van above the tires, or the corners of the pillars. ![]() But a good example of what I'm trying to say, is that second image in that gallery. If I say anymore, I'd be going into a rant. ![]() ![]() So what if that grunt a mile away is rendered with a few pixels less? Once he's up close that means that grunt now is able to be rendered with more details in polygons and textures and lighting, etc. I remember back when the internet was outraged at how Halo wasn't truly running at 720 lines of resolution. I will gladly sacrifice a few lines of pixels being displayed if it means a smoother framerate or just better graphical effects in general. Personally, I still hold the opinion that processing power could be better used to render more polygons, post processing effects, particle effects, higher texture resolutions, lighting effects, etc. What is with people and their obsession with screen resolution? I guess different people have different priorities but I believe most people don't truly understand the significance of how higher screen resolution contributes to image quality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |